Creating 21st Century Information-Literacy Programs

Rick Bearden and Emily Mitchell, Ferris State University

PILOT (Project Information Literacy Online Tutorial); Texas Information Tutorial (TILT)

One of the best things about TILT is you don’t have to recreate the wheel; it’s free.

bad: out-dated; ugly

Library Orientation all online students at Ferris State would take. PILOT was out-of-date. But limited on time: had to reorganize and restructure physical library.

New tutorial criteria

  • modular (student can just come in and take relevant part and then apply)
  • linkable (point of need)
  • easy to update (PILOT hadn’t been updated in years; not easy to update!)
  • interactive (old, boring: lots of text, bad; interactivity would need to be easily editable)

Interface features supporting criteria

  • navigation with both menu and arrows
  • Provide many ways to learn (varied display elements)
  • A new session will start from where you left off (you get interrupted)
  • Real time feedback from practice exercises

Screenshots being shown of the presentation right now.

  • Online chat embedded as part of the new tutorial
  • Simple elements such as a table can be used. Easily buildable pages (CSS does the formatting)
  • Fancier elements such as a lightboxes are available
  • Go interactive with drag and drop practice exercises (Not Flash — Javascript)
  • Code is provided for more elements: headings, paragraphs, lists, audio files, emphasis boxes, images, links (or include your own HTML)

Tutorial creation of interface

Philosophy of design: (Rick doesn’t like CMSes like Drupal) Philosophy of design: provide tools for novices to build useful tutorials but don’t dumb it down so much that it is impossible to do anything cool.

Editing Home, uses tabs

  • Add metadata
  • Edit metadata
  • Edit content
  • View content
  • Reorder
  • Delete
  • Upload File
  • Can clone it

Create and Manage quiz sets available

PILOT runs on LAMP. Code, content, and documentation will be made freely available to any library that wants it early summer 2011. Come up to leave us a business card if you want to be contacted when we are ready for distribution; or you can email us at: Rick Bearden (beardenr@ferris.edu) Emily Mitchell (mitchee3@ferris.edu)

Alan Bearman, Sean Bird, Keith Rocci, Washburn University

Interactive Presentation online

Information-Literacy Programs: The Washburn University Model (Topeka, KS)

London, Kentucky, Kansas journey — accent fun 🙂

Is the physical library in the 21st Century necessary? (The Googlization of Everything argument)

Washburn is a teaching university, sits between two research universities (KU and K-State); administration asked do we need a physical library in the 21st century. Dr. Bearman became the Dean of Libraries at Washburn University in 2008.

The library had become disengaged from the university. It had been a place that purchased lots of physical stuff just in case. Collection-centric model. Administration was really questioning the value of the library at the campus.

YES! The campus does still need a library. The library is more important today than ever before; not because of the collection but because of the people. The librarians are absolutely crucial to our teaching of information literacy. Administration response: what’s information literacy?

“To create information literate graduates the university library must be central to the student experience”

You can create information literate graduates in the information age, if they’re discontented from the students. Extend the library. Not just physical space. Digital branch. Local: tutorials for specific classes. Generic — general tutorials. Parents — orientation, library speaks to them. Library must be central to the student experience.

Washburn University Learning Outcomes (went from 9 vague standards unmeasurable to these)

  1. Communication (COM)
  2. Quantitative and Scientific Reasoning and Literacy (QSRL)
  3. Information Literacy and Technology (ILT)
  4. Critical and Creative Thinking (CCT)
  5. Global Citizenship, Ethics and Diversity (GCED)

Library had to figure out how to teach this outcome.

How did we assess our efforts? (keith is a teacher)

  1. Retention: 8% increase for 2009 cohort
  2. Student achievement: .37 increased GPA
  3. Student surveys: 84% student satisfaction

Success brings success.

Are we successful? (Sean Bird)

(data drives what we do) anecdotal evidence; Sean has seen this library since 1985 as an alum.

Library demanded them to study in the same ways as in the analog world, even in 2005

After Dr. Bearman came, things changed. No more zones. Carrels

Now different types of zones. Collaboration allowed.

  1. Library traffic increased 15%
  2. University President is a strong advocate (before didn’t think the library necessary)
  3. Academic Support Initiatives moved to library
  4. Second Assistant Dean position
  5. Coffee Kiosk

The library was packed. Every table was packed. Every computer was packed. Reading. Writing. The library place had changed.

Departments are holding meetings in the library because of the coffee shop.

Students are being encouraged to use the library to be questions.

Questions

  • Retention rate: Washburn had been criticized about its retention rate VERY publicly. The information literacy emphasis will hopefully drastically improve the retention rate. Students overwhelmed by information overload; must learn to deal with information. Washburn is working on this through their changes. Still to know the data.
  • Information Literacy: classes were taught for 15 years; 1 unit class “the library experience” tied to 2 unit class “the college experience” the content isn’t much different. Serials librarian teaching (rejuvenated his career); Access services librarian enjoying as well. Students get grades from this point. The instruction librarians — faculty status. The library went out and engaged the faculty and conversation and administration. That made a HUGE difference.
  • Washburn University: does have digital tutorials.

Keynote: How libraries add value to communities

Note: Next year’s conference is March 21-23 at the Hilton again.

Lee Rainie, Director Pew Internet Project

email: lrainie@pewinternet.org

Twitter: Lrainie

pew pew pew slide (token cat picture)

No agenda or position or anything. PEW generates primary useful information for their stakeholders, like librarians.

emperor of keynotes? &”monarch of twitter feedback” @itsjustkate tweet

Internet and Broadband Revolution (Revolutionary war picture)

  • 24% of Americans only have cell phones (no landline): 50% are under 30.
  • Change in internet use by age, 2000-2010 graph: in about 2007, flattening of Internet growth begins. Librarians have been helpful in teaching the resistant population, to feel comfortable with the technology and space.
  • Home broadband adoption, 2000-2010 graph: Dialup vs. Broadband: 2/3 of adults still have broadband (Comment: What’s their broadband metric? What’s the definition of broadband??; sister in rural area can only get 300K or 700K “high-speed” internet — that’s never going to stream YouTube, let alone Netflix, yet in most cases, still fits the broadband definition)
  • Broadband adoption by community type rural vs urban vs suburban does drastically vary
  • Demographic factors correlated w/ broadband adoption: positive: parents with children higher adoption rates of broadband; higher education=higher broadband adoption; higher household income; married/living w partner; employed full time; negative: high school degree or less; senior citizen; spanish, disabled; unemployed
  • Consequence for info ecosystem: Volume; Velocity; Vibrance; Valence/Relevance; explosion of creators
  • 62% of users are social networking site users; 55% share photos (these people are drastically different than non-photo-sharers); 14% are bloggers; 12% use Twitter; 4-17% use location-sharing services
  • where you are is an important part of your mission; didn’t use to be that way
  • location is a new layer of information; useful to understand

Big challenge for libraries: atoms –> bits

Big value-add by libraries

1. Cover access divides

  • 44% of those living below the poverty line used library connections
  • 61% of those ages 14-24 used them for school
  • 54% of poor senior citizens used library connections for health/wellness needs
  • 63% used library connections to help others [using it on behalf of someone else]

Opportunity for All, University of Washington Gates Foundation; IMLS Report

How PEW asks it’s questions on Broadband speeds (thanks @PEW_Internet for fast response to my question!)

2. Cover participatory divides

  • 2/3 of lib connection users sought assistance from library staff
  • 60% of library connectors use them for social purposes
  • 42 % for education purposes
  • 40% for job/career purposes
  • 37% health and wellness purposes
  • 33% for community engagement
  • libraries are great places for teaching about online environment.
  • tell stories, get views out, better contributors

But there is more libraries can do

relevance and digital literacy are primary factors for not getting online

  • Availability 6%
  • Usability 18%
  • Price 21%
  • Other 7%
  • Relevance 47%

Need to show them availability of Health info, news, govt officials, political process.

Bad information for the people with these above opinions. Libraries can help with this. More handholding, mentoring….

2. Wireless Connectivity Revolution

  • Cell phone owners – 85% adults own cell phones now.
  • Fasted adoption of technology around the globe than any other in the history of human species

Things people do:

  • go online w laptop
  • go online wireless w cell phone

Mobile internet connectors 57% adults (43% still don’t have it)

Usage by demographics

  • Urban 80
  • Suburban 60
  • Rural 43

Positive correlation: college grad; 75K household income; parent of minor child

Negative correlation: less than hs education; 30K household; rural; ??

Cell phones as social tools: photo video/access social networking site; watching videos/ post online; purchased a product….

Apps: 35% have apps; no apps 47%; no cell 18%; use an app: 24%

App user profile: Male/young/well educated/affluent

Stephen Abrams point (Comment: I think that’s what he said) Web: who what when and where; apps world: how and why (databases, customized reliable info from trusted sources)

Web still good for lots of things.

What’s good in one space. What’s good in other spaces. Very good points. [Definitely agree with this: apps on phone & tablet for certain information consumption; use laptop and desktop apps/web browser for content creation right now]

  • 55% of adults own laptops
  • 7% of adults own ebook readers (kindle)
  • 7% of adults own tablets – iPad doubled in 6 months; iPad number may be up to 10% now; 75K +: number may be 25%

Consequences for info ecosystem: Anywhere; any  device; place presence; anytime; alone together (also book title); can always be interrupted;

Big challenges for libraries:

People come to us –> we go to people

The library as place becomes the library as placeless resource.

Big value for libraries:

  • help navigate and “make peace” with info: the HOW and the WHY
  • apps vs. web vs. traditional resource locators
  • libraries consider the public good much better than the media companies
  • real time info matters more and people want access
  • embedded actors in realtime sharing of info
  • context of information – augmented reality: overlay reality with data & stories
  • [Comment: Lacygne Historical Podcasts through the library]
  • Sanctuary – quiet place

3. Social Networking Revolution

The social networking population is more diverse than you might think.

  • Old People can network socially too [note from his slide :)]
  • 48% of the population uses social network
  • Parents and Grandparents friending kids and grandkids

Demographic factors

  • Positive: under age 30; female (overall use more); men (frequently use); parent w minor child at home; some college; urban
  • Negative: senior citizen (65+); rural; non-cell user; disability

Online video

Video creation

Online social networks + ubiquitous mobility

  • Social networks are their homepages: first thing in morning and last thing at night.
  • Social dashboard: FOMO: Fear of Missing out.
  • Pervasive awareness: what’s going on in your world (pre-Internet data not available): do people know more about friends and family than they ever did anymore? Yes, it looks so, but can’t go back in time to figure this out for sure.
  • Allows for immediate spontaneous creation of networks (crowdsourcing; mobs — Howard Reingold)
  • Gives people a sense that there are more “friends” in their networks that they can access when they have needs (PLNs)

Big shift for libraries: expertise and influence shifts to networks

  • Share the stage with amateur experts

Big value-add by libraries

1. Can be embedded in….

  • Watch how people have needs and desires for information in networks and contribute to it. (Buffy Hamilton in the classroom :))
  • Spaces
  • Attention zones: continuos partial attention (all devices on; hard to concentrate; always interrupted — can’t go off the grid); deep dives (amateur experts): medical situations; “golden age of amateur experts”; info-snacking (Angry birds) — have a little time to kill (in line, etc.); Day dreaming??? (Erica got at this in Elegance)
  • Media zones: Social streams; immersive; Creative/participatory (research; make something new); Study/work (where we’ve shined for eons)
  • Use Different approaches to be truly effective

2. Can be nodes in social networks

  • As sentries: word of mouth matters more
  • As information evaluators: they vouch for/discredit a business’s credibility and authenticity (ping smarter people in their networks about something); scale tippers
  • As forums for action: everybody’s a broadcaster/publisher: people listening and watching.

Cosmic things

1. Can be teachers of new literacies: screen literacy: Graphics & symbols; navigation literacy: connections and context literacy; skepticism; value of contemplative time; how to create content; ethical behavior in new world;

USC researcher: Henry Jenkins (participatory divide)

2. Can help fill in civic gaps: the big sort among institutions: public, private, non-profit re-imagining roles; the big sort on news and info landscape; the big empowerment and move to networked individuals

Librarians get “how precious information is” Be not afraid.

Getting to the Eureka! Moment

Julian Aiken, Access Services Librarian, Yale Law Library

Google Model for Innovation Using (and Abusing it) at Yale Law School

Brilliant but Rummy (Odd) Idea No. 1

Personal Motivations.

Idea #2

When in doubt, cheat, copy, steal, and pillage.

Google.

It’s from Wikipedia, so it must be true.

Google 80/20 innovation model. Gmail, Google News, Google Shuttle, etc., came from it.

Google Earth.

Google’s Model: 80 % of staff time spent on core projects. 20% of time spent on company related projects that interest them personally. If you have a great idea, you’re supported to run with it.

Achieving Institutional Buy-in.

  • staff are asked to do more with less.
  • why then take them away from core duties for 80/20 models
  • this is a way to reward staff.
  • Ex. “reserved for employee of the month” parking passes

Adversity inventions during WWII

  • chicken dinners
  • t-shirts
  • tom and jerry
  • spam
  • frisbee
  • duct tape
  • joystick
  • synthetic rubber
  • accurate brassiere cup sizing

This model can improve inter-departmental relationships: esp technical services & public services.

new and richer understanding of each other.

You know we’re two hearts believing in one mind…la la la… Phil Collins

By working in reference, Technical Services librarians took a lot of what they knew about the collection already through cataloging… [wildebeasts slide]

Cross training.

Initiatives developed through this model

Questions

  • Pilot project that was developed in a 6-person dept. 4 of the 6 staff working currently; other two will join shortly. If it works, it will move to the larger library. Many other libraries are using similar models.
  • How close to the institution does the project need to be? library-related at least.
  • Cost? Time or financial too. Repository required software purchase. But the others didn’t. [idea had already been tossed around before this model was used]
  • Question raised. Using work resources while off the clock to do professional things.
  • Speaker discusses this model has allowed him to interact more with ILL and learn the other areas. It does depend on how well-staffed you are, but even when tight-staffed, it’s still worked.
  • No cases where “No” has been said, but idea has been further developed to fit the library’s needs.
  • Outreach ideas can come from this model.

eBooks and their Growing Value for Libraries Panel

Amy Pawlowski, Web App Manager at Cleveland Public Library

Sue Polanka, Head of Referene and Instruction at Wright State University Libraries, Author of No Shelf Required

Ellen Druda, Librarian, Internet Services, Half Hollow Hills Community Library

Rosemarie Jerome, Librarian, Half Hollow Hills Community Library

Bianca Crowley, Smithsonian

Amy Pawlowski & Sue Polanka

Public Library

  • 72% of Public Libraries are offering eBooks (LJ report)
  • 55K thousand titles in the Cleveland Public Library eBook collection
  • 5% of public libraries circulate preloaded ereading devices, while 24% are considering it. Kindle was the top device.
  • 1/5 of the US online population reads at least 2 books per month. How to capture that audience?

Academic Library

  • 94% of academic libraries already offer ebooks
  • 80% by 2020- academic econtent expenditures
  • 87% of students say online libraries/databases have impact on learning (Cengage study cited)
  • 50% found positive ebooks/textbooks impact
  • LJ Mobile survey: 65 % of academic libraries offer services via mobile

Value fo Libraries

  • 24/7 access anywhere
  • econtent meets users where they are
    • distance learning
    • virtual reference services
    • mobile websites
    • Course Management Systems
    • Online instruction
    • Self-service research
    • lots of free eBooks available — expand library’s collection that way [CLiC MARC record project]
    • Staying current/relevent by delivering a service to a growing demographic
    • eReaders and tablet market
    • Mobile market

Economic impact for Public Libraries

  • Collection Development Budget
  • Current Cost effectiveness stats

How to Position Your Library: Public Libraries

  • The waiting is over; don’t say you can’t afford it. Join consortiums, etc. [My comment: But still, What about rural libraries with tiny budgets?? Sigh; is there a digital divide in libraries?]
  • Know the platforms and products and how they work
  • Start planning for the future now
  • Consider circulating eReaders and Tablets (still disagree with this PoV)
  • Plan for collection development
  • Training and marketing

How to Position Your Library: Academic Libraries

  • the future is econtent
  • understand the current limitations
  • Advocate for a sustainable future
  • Access/discovery are key
  • Brand your content
  • Ownership has its privileges
  • Be open to new ideas and experimentation
  • Talk to vendors
  • Customize the interfaces

Ellen Druda and Rosemarie Jerome

  • Marketing: Staff received buttons (and script went with buttons for in case someone was asked about eBooks)
  • Skype an author (iDrakula discussion)

Bianca Crowley’s Slides

Teching Up: Traditional Library Programs

Sue Scott

Marlboro Free Library

Why care about technology?

  • Bridging the digital divide
  • showing what is possible
  • speaking to digital natives
  • digital literacy (access not enough; have to know how to use it)
  • balance caution with enthusiasm
  • everything in moderation

Children’s Programs

  • Skyping Toddlertime
    • (2 laptops with cameras and skype; external speakers)
    • LCD TV with video cable to laptop
    • singing storytime; librarian was at home; kids at the library
  • Technology Tuesday camp with 4th and 5th graders
    • 8 weeks after school program: movie creation; game development; gaming; tech crafts
    • Movies:
      • Publisher to create movie premier flyers;
      • took digital camera pics of kids and had them use PAINT to create scary masks;
      • used audacity to import music CD tracks of scary sounds as MP3s into Adobe Elements
    • Game development:
      • set aside 6 computers
      • used web based game tools like Ben10 and Star Wars
      • Went through Scratch tutorial
    • Crafts:
      • Created Starship Enterprise or notebook out of floppies
      • Opened up old computer

Other Kids Programs

  • Cooking: enhance trad’l porgrams with some video games, websites, online movies, multimedia (cooking club
  • Babysitting Class: plays flash games, www.oyunlar1.com/index.asp
  • Book club with online movies: www.patrickcarman.com/enter/skeleton-creek
  • Use video games as part of programming to entice new demographics to visit the library.
  • Buy books for the collection based on video game worlds
  • Kinect/Rock Band require equipment they may not have home; encourage multiplayer, tournaments.

(Comment: Lots of videos in this session — great! Wonder if they’re online anywhere (telling stories better than statements or descriptions –also true for videos over powerpoint bullets)

 

Library videos everything; they are all on the library’s YouTube channel

Partnership with Boy Scouts

  • Belt Loop
  • Academic Pin Requirements

Technology Petting Zoo FAQ

  • borrow stuff for people to use; people bring in their own devices
  • Many websites listed on the slides to show (will try to get and add later!)

Applications used: all free ones from CNet.com/dowloads

Programs for Teens

Celebrating the release of Breaking Dawn: Book Club Idea (Dinner party)

  • Note the slideshow of stills on the TV from the upcoming Twilight Moon
  • Music playing from Twilight CD and Muse (Stephenie’s Meyer’s favorite band)
  • Interviews/Reviews filmed for our YouTube Channel

Alternative Fashion Show

  • Teens walked to their favorite song (used the chorus)
  • iTunes + AnyVideo Converter + Audacity for the process to get the 20 second clip of the songs

Adult Programming

READ posters

Use author websites; blogs; wikis or forums; for book club discussion

Senior Wii Bowling League

Create Computer Classes

http://gameslib.wordpress.com

Patron Computer Desktop: Have experience that patrons would have at home.

  • Multiple browser options available
  • Image editors
  • Google Earth
  • Tax forms links
  • Blogs on the library websites

Library website uses WordPress. Easy to do 🙂 [yep, WordPress is awesome: www.mykansaslibrary.org; nekls.org] Easy to create mobile site with WordPress.

PSA video from the library, or watch it below

Questions

  • Does your library train patrons and staff on how to use the Open Source software available? No. They are told to go to watch YouTube videos on the software in question. You can learn anything from YouTube.  [Great idea!]
  • Concerns about waivers. Shoot videos from the back. No names. If faces shown, waivers signed.
  • Flickr site: library doesn’t have one; write blog entries with pictures.
  • Marketing to teens? they don’t. no budget for teen librarian. have the library pages who then draw in other people